Visualisations

Arousal, Valence, Tempo, Instrumentalness; which has which?

In this plot it is interesting to see that tracks with a high instrumentalness, have a lower arousal and tempo. This will be the foundation for further analysis. On the basis of the features valence, arousal, tempo and instrumentalness one could say that lo-l-1 and reinout-w-2 are eachother extremes. What makes them that much different?

Chromagrams of Lo’s and Reinout’s tracks

These chromagrams represent the intensity of different pitch classes over time. This visualization highlights the harmonic content of the track, showing which notes are most prominent at each moment. Patterns in the chromagram indicate key changes, chord progressions, or repeating harmonic structures. While the track of Lo is mostly in pitch class G, the track of reinout does not cointain a certain pitchclass.

Self-similarity matrix based on chroma of Lo’s and Reinout’s tracks

These self-similarity matrix’ are based on chroma features. This matrix reveals structural characteristics of the track by comparing its harmonic content over time. A strong diagonal line indicates perfect self-similarity, meaning the music remains consistent over time. Additionally, block-like patterns suggest recurring sections, such as verses and choruses, while grid-like formations may be linked to rhythmic consistency or percussive elements. The track of Lo gives a beautiful grid-pattern, in contrary to the track of Reinout. The mix of bright and dark regions suggests variations in melodic or harmonic content, meaning the song follows a structured composition with repeated themes and distinct transitions, which is not the case with the track of Reinout. The matrix of Reinouts track indicates a lot of changes continuously without repeating motifs or sections.

self-similarity matrix based on timbre of Lo’s and Reinout’s tracks

These self-similarity matrix’ are based on timbre features. Timbre refers to the texture and tone color of the sound, often influenced by instrument choice and production techniques. This matrix reveals a structured musical piece with clear repetition. The strong diagonal line again indicates self-similarity, while variations in the matrix suggest dynamic changes in instrumentation and sonic texture. Grid-like formations may indicate rhythmically consistent elements, while larger block structures suggest repeated themes or motifs across different sections of the track. The high similarity at the beginning and end of the piece suggests a well-defined structure, potentially featuring repeated introductions and conclusions. Again, here Lo’s track had a obvious grid-structure, which indicates that it is a structured song with well-defined sections. What is interesting to see in Reinouts matrix, is that there is high variation, meaning it does not strongly repeat timbral elements throughout. The bight yellow-green bands on the top and right edges indicate a strong similarity between the beginning and the end of the piece.

Chordograms of Lo’s and Reinout’s tracks

These chordogram displays matches with expectations of certain played chords. A template is created to represent the presence or absence of certain traits, such as chords, in a piece of music. This template indicates the amount of energy present in specific chords. The chordogram visualizes the relationship by showing how closely the audio matches the template. In the chordogram, dark blue indicates a good match, while yellow indicates a poor match, making it easier to identify which chords are most prominent in the audio. As you can see in the chordogram the chords used in the track of Lo are as expected a lot, and are mostly in E and G, while the chordogram has some difficulty making distinctions between g major and g minor, and e minor and e-flat major. Now, for Reinouts track, the chordogram has a lot of difficulty distinguishing between all the chords. There is a lot of variation in the yellows and blues, indicating variation in the chords.

Introduction

Row

This portfolio was made for the course Computational Musicology at the UvA. The portfolio will give insight on interesting comparisons between different AI-made tracks!

Row